logo
down
shadow

Synchronization with implicitwait() do not work, why?


Synchronization with implicitwait() do not work, why?

By : Pratyay Ghosh
Date : November 24 2020, 03:01 PM
I wish this help you I'm trying synchronization with selenium webdriver and something is not working with implicitlyWait(). , You have to wait that your element is clickable. Try adding this:
code :
 WebElement element = (new WebDriverWait(driver, 10))
                .until(ExpectedConditions.elementToBeClickable(By.cssSelector(cssSelectorFromAirport)));
    setupWebDriverChrome();
    //Thread.sleep(1000);
    final String cssSelectorFromAirport = "div.od-airportselector.airportselector_root input[tabindex='11']";
    WebElement element = (new WebDriverWait(driver, 10))
            .until(ExpectedConditions.elementToBeClickable(By.cssSelector(cssSelectorFromAirport)));
    /*final By cssSelector = By.cssSelector(cssSelectorFromAirport);
    WebElement fromAirportElement = driver.findElement(cssSelector);
    System.out.println("-->> " + fromAirportElement.isDisplayed() + " " + fromAirportElement.isEnabled() + " " + fromAirportElement.isSelected());*/
    element.clear();
    element.sendKeys("MUC");
System.out.println("-->> " + fromAirportElement.isDisplayed() + " " + fromAirportElement.isEnabled() + " " + fromAirportElement.isSelected() );
-->> false true false
-->> true true false


Share : facebook icon twitter icon
webdriver implicitWait not working as expected

webdriver implicitWait not working as expected


By : Torbine
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
hope this fix your issue In webdriver code if i use thread.sleep(20000). It's waiting for 20 seconds, and my code also works fine. To archive the same if i use implicit wait like , Use below method to wait for a element:
code :
public boolean waitForElementToBePresent(By by, int waitInMilliSeconds) throws Exception
{

    int wait = waitInMilliSeconds;
    int iterations  = (wait/250);
    long startmilliSec = System.currentTimeMillis();
    for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
    {
        if((System.currentTimeMillis()-startmilliSec)>wait)
            return false;
        List<WebElement> elements = driver.findElements(by);
        if (elements != null && elements.size() > 0)
            return true;
        Thread.sleep(250);
    }
    return false;
}
public void waitForPageLoadingToComplete() throws Exception {
    ExpectedCondition<Boolean> expectation = new ExpectedCondition<Boolean>() {
        public Boolean apply(WebDriver driver) {
            return ((JavascriptExecutor) driver).executeScript(
                    "return      document.readyState").equals("complete");
        }
    };
    Wait<WebDriver> wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, 30);
    wait.until(expectation);
}
waitForElementToBePresent(By.id("Something"), 20000)
WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(webDriver, timeoutInSeconds);
wait.until(ExpectedConditions.visibilityOfElementLocated(By.id<locator>));
wait.until(ExpectedConditions.elementToBeClickable(By.id<locator>));
public boolean waitForTextFiled(By by, int waitInMilliSeconds, WebDriver wdriver) throws Exception
    {
        WebDriver driver = wdriver;
        int wait = waitInMilliSeconds;
        int iterations  = (wait/250);
        long startmilliSec = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
        {
            if((System.currentTimeMillis()-startmilliSec)>wait)
                return false;
            driver.findElement(By.id("txt")).sendKeys("Something");
            String name =  driver.findElement(by).getAttribute("value");

            if (name != null && !name.equals("")){
                return true;
            }
            Thread.sleep(250);
        }
        return false;
    }
WebDriver ImplicitWait don't work, waiting for element is longer then setted

WebDriver ImplicitWait don't work, waiting for element is longer then setted


By : user3597394
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
should help you out Implicit and Explicit waits are thoroughly tested and used by good number of users. As you mentioned that you are using explicit wait with Implicit that's clearly indicated the reason of that unexpected behavior. I did a good amount of research on how mixing them up together can adversely change the timeout. See this thread. And, I would suggest you to remove the explicit or any other kind of wait and retest.
How to set ImplicitWait in Selenium 3.1.0

How to set ImplicitWait in Selenium 3.1.0


By : Big Ham
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
will help you After digging through the source code in github I found that ImplicitWait set and get methods are using (in the lower level) ICommandExecutor to set and get the value. The only FireFoxDriver constructor witch initialize this variable in the parent RemoteWebDriver is
code :
public FirefoxDriver(FirefoxDriverService service, FirefoxOptions options, TimeSpan commandTimeout) : base(CreateExecutor(service, options, commandTimeout), ConvertOptionsToCapabilities(options))
public RemoteWebDriver(ICommandExecutor commandExecutor, ICapabilities desiredCapabilities)
FirefoxOptions firefoxOptions = new FirefoxOptions
{
    Profile = fxProfile, // I'm using FirefoxProfile as well
    UseLegacyImplementation = true
};

IWebDriver driver = new FirefoxDriver(FirefoxDriverService.CreateDefaultService(), firefoxOptions, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30));
ImplicitWait does not seem to work in Selenium Webdriver to wait for elements

ImplicitWait does not seem to work in Selenium Webdriver to wait for elements


By : Roy Leidolph
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
wish of those help I am trying to automate the Internet Explorer in c# using selenium-webdriver to fill a formular on an external website. Sometimes the code throws randomly errors (Unable to find element with name == xxx), because it cannot find the searched elements. It's not happening every time and not necessarily in the same places. , You can use Explicit wait like this example:
code :
var wait = new WebDriverWait(Driver.Instance, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10));
wait.until(ExpectedConditions.invisibilityOfElementLocated(By.id("your locator")));
Does the switching of a synchronization context mean that the work will run on the thread that owns the synchronization

Does the switching of a synchronization context mean that the work will run on the thread that owns the synchronization


By : Reelu
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
To fix the issue you can do I have an async intro blog post that explains how await works with SynchronizationContext.Current. Specifically, await uses the captured context to resume the async method.
So, this is not correct:
shadow
Privacy Policy - Terms - Contact Us © voile276.org